Accessibility conformance summary

Accessibility Conformance Statement

This document provides a concise, vendor-facing summary of current accessibility evidence for Edocti's public websites, with a focus on automated Google PageSpeed Insights / Lighthouse accessibility audit outcomes and ongoing accessibility-oriented design practices.

Purpose and current position

What this document is for

This statement is intended to support requests for accessibility information relating to Edocti's technology services. It summarises current automated audit evidence for the public web experiences available at edocti.com and education.edocti.com.

Important qualification

This is a VPAT-style preliminary statement, not a fully completed official VPAT / Accessibility Conformance Report. A full criterion-by-criterion VPAT normally requires dedicated manual testing, expert review and product-specific evidence beyond automated tooling alone.

Based on the automated audit results referenced by this document, the tested public pages for both domains achieved a reported 100 / 100 accessibility score in Google PageSpeed Insights / Lighthouse on both mobile and desktop audit modes.

Audit evidence summary

Website / service	Audit mode	Reported accessibility score	Assessment note
edocti.com	Mobile	100 / 100	Automated Google PageSpeed Insights / Lighthouse accessibility audit result referenced for this statement.
edocti.com	Desktop	100 / 100	Automated Google PageSpeed Insights / Lighthouse accessibility audit result referenced for this statement.
education.edocti.com	Mobile	100 / 100	Automated Google PageSpeed Insights / Lighthouse accessibility audit result referenced for this statement.
education.edocti.com	Desktop	100 / 100	Automated Google PageSpeed Insights / Lighthouse accessibility audit result referenced for this statement.

Reported scores are relevant to the audited public pages and configurations used during testing. Accessibility can vary across page templates, authenticated areas, embedded third-party components, downloadable files, media content and future releases.

Evaluation basis

Reference standard

The accessibility target referenced in procurement discussions is typically WCAG 2.2 Level AA. This statement uses that framework as the relevant benchmark for describing expected accessibility outcomes.

Evidence source

The evidence summarised here is based on automated accessibility audits performed with Google PageSpeed Insights / Lighthouse on mobile and desktop configurations.

What the scores indicate

A maximum automated accessibility score indicates that the audited pages passed the set of automated checks included in the tool at the time of testing and that no issues were flagged by those checks.

What still remains important

Manual validation remains important for complete accessibility due diligence, especially for keyboard-only use, screen reader behaviour, focus order, complex interactions, form recovery, zoom and reflow, PDFs and video content.

Accessibility approach

Design and delivery principles

Use accessibility-aware design and development practices for public web content.
Review public pages with automated tooling as part of quality control and ongoing improvement.
Address issues identified by automated audit tools as part of regular maintenance and release work.
Support clear structure, readable content, responsive behaviour and accessible user journeys.

Continuous improvement

Accessibility is treated as an ongoing quality objective rather than a one-time exercise.
Future product updates, new templates and embedded third-party content are reviewed to reduce accessibility risk.
Where customers require a formal Accessibility Conformance Report, a deeper manual review can be prepared.

Practical interpretation: the current evidence supports a strong accessibility position for the tested public pages, while a formal final conformance statement for procurement-grade VPAT use should include manual expert assessment in addition to automated results.

Recommended next-step evidence

Manual validation areas

Keyboard-only navigation and visible focus across all core journeys
Screen reader behaviour for navigation, headings, forms and status messages
Zoom, reflow and responsive behaviour at higher magnification levels
Form validation, error identification and recovery workflows
Downloadable files, media players and embedded third-party components

Helpful supporting attachments

Audit screenshots or exported reports for each URL tested
List of representative pages included in the automated review
Date of testing and configuration used for mobile and desktop audits
Accessibility issue log, if any issues were remediated after testing
Formal expert review notes where a customer requests a completed VPAT / ACR

Declaration for procurement

Edocti's public websites at edocti.com and education.edocti.com have been assessed using automated Google PageSpeed Insights / Lighthouse accessibility audits. Based on the audit results referenced by this document, the tested public pages achieved 100 / 100 accessibility scores on both mobile and desktop. These results indicate strong alignment with the automated accessibility checks performed by the tool. Where a full formal VPAT / ACR is specifically requested, Edocti can extend the assessment with manual expert review and criterion-by-criterion documentation.